Create a course

Build lessons from your sources, turn them into assessments, and set up an AI tutor your students can use around the clock. You keep the final say at every step.

Design Thinking Frameworks for Higher EducationDraft

PreviewPublish

Sticky notes in green and yellow arranged on ...

User Centricity

Understanding user perspectives, motivations, and hidden pain points rather than assuming needs from institutional leadership.

A whiteboard covered with colorful sticky note...

Wicked Problem Framing

Formulating open-ended 'How might we...?' questions that turn complex systemic issues into actionable opportunities.

A group of people gathered in a circle, all at eq...

Flattened Hierarchy

Operating without rank to foster rapid psychological safety, open peer review, and candid cross-disciplinary dialogue.

Preview: Design Thinking Assessment for Interdisciplinary Engineering SolutionsExit Preview

Your Results

This is a preview — no data has been saved.

105 / 130

81%

Question 322 / 25

Analyze a scenario where a team uses both brainstorming and dot voting to address a challenge in interdisciplinary engineering education. Explain how these techniques complement each other and what practical outcomes they might achieve.

25 PointsOpen Ended

Answer

Our team brainstormed thirty ideas for making the engineering lab more inclusive, then used dot voting to narrow them to three. Brainstorming kept the options wide, and dot voting let everyone weigh in quickly, so we left with a short list the whole team wanted to prototype.

Feedback

Clear account of how brainstorming opens up options and dot voting narrows them. Tie the outcome to a measurable result in engineering education for full marks.

AI Tutor Preview

How students will experience the tutor

I don't understand why Newton's second law uses acceleration instead of velocity.

5:00 AM

Ooh great question! 🤔 Imagine pushing a skateboard — if you keep pushing, does it go faster and faster, or just stay at the same speed?

5:00 AM

Faster and faster I think!

5:01 AM

Yes!! 🎉 So the force is changing the speed change, not the speed itself — what do we call that speed change? You're so close!

5:01 AM

Backward design, built in.

Objectives first

Every lesson begins with learning objectives drawn from your materials.

Instructor oversight

AI drafts are editable, and suggested grades are reviewed before results are released.

Practice and assessment

Lesson questions are for practice. Assessments record formal grades.

Learning science as the blueprint.

Blocks and exercise types

Example-to-ConceptConcept-to-ExampleProblem SetEquation ExplanationReverse EngineeringPredictionError AnalysisQuestionInteractiveGraphCard

TextHighlightVideoAudioCodeTableImageFlashcardsEquationMind Map

Lesson objectives

Objectives from your materials

Upload the documents and slides you already teach with. Collage suggests learning objectives from them, and you keep the ones that fit before the lesson is generated.

Let's start with your materials

Upload any documents, slides, or resources you'd like to use for this lesson.

Edit

design-thinking-a4-e-handbookv2july20a-wfinalnov20web-132508830119080458.pdf

Select your learning objectives

Based on your materials, here are suggested learning objectives for this lesson. Review and select the ones you want to include.

Apply the four-stage design thinking framework (Explore, Create, Prototype, Evaluate) to structure and solve complex, user-centered engineering and organizational problems.

Analyze stakeholder needs and frame actionable design challenges using diagnostic tools such as persona mapping, the 5 Whys technique, and user journey analysis.

Execute divergent and convergent ideation techniques, including brainstorming, brainwriting, and dot voting, to generate and filter multi-faceted solution concepts.

Construct rapid low-fidelity physical prototypes and storyboards to iteratively test concepts, gather user feedback, and demonstrate project viability.

Evaluate team dynamics, facilitation methods, and institutional constraints to effectively lead interdisciplinary engineering and management collaboration.

Add ObjectiveGenerate Objective

Continue

Lesson blocks

Built block by block

A lesson is a stack of blocks: text, callouts, mind maps, questions, video, and nine more. Add, move, or edit any block without touching the rest.

Text

The Design Thinking Philosophy in Higher Education

Design thinking provides a structured, creative framework to tackle complex or "wicked" problems—ill-defined challenges that lack clear boundaries or single, straightforward answers.

Fundamental Characteristics

Empathetic and User-Centred Focus: Placing the actual users (such as students, researchers, or administrative staff) at the absolute heart of problem framing and solution generation.
Action-Oriented and Haptic Learning: Embracing a learning-by-doing ethos through hands-on interaction, writing, sketch modeling, and physical building.

Callout

Info

In the DT.Uni methodology, design challenges begin with a "How might we...?" formulation. Rather than jumping directly to predetermined conclusions, teams cycle iteratively through Explore (empathy and problem identification), Create (ideation and filtering), Prototype (tangible realization), and Evaluate (feedback and redevelopment) to systematically de-risk innovation.

Mind Map

Question

What makes the 'Improving Student Onboarding' example an application of the DT.Uni framework?

Options (select correct answers)Add Option

It focuses on marketing the university rather than solving onboarding issues

It implements changes without gathering feedback from students

It relies solely on staff opinions to change the process

It uses the four-stage cycle to identify needs, generate ideas, test, and refine onboarding

Explanation (optional)

The process mirrors the DT.Uni stages: Explore, Create, Prototype, and Evaluate.

Assessment

Assessments from your lessons

Pick the lesson you just built as the source and add any instructions. The AI drafts the questions, and you edit them before anything goes out.

Grading

Graded against your criteria

Each question has criteria with point weights, so the AI scores the way you would. You review its suggested grades, change any you disagree with, and release results when you're ready.

Preview: Design Thinking Assessment for Interdisciplinary Engineering SolutionsExit Preview

Your Results

This is a preview — no data has been saved.

105 / 130

81%

Question 322 / 25

25 PointsOpen Ended

Answer

Feedback

Clear account of how brainstorming opens up options and dot voting narrows them. Tie the outcome to a measurable result in engineering education for full marks.

Feedback

Immediate feedback on practice

Questions inside a lesson are for practice, not grades. When a student gets one wrong, they see a hint right away and can try again.

Question 1 of 2

In the example above, what property makes the DNA sequence similar to how text is stored in Python?

Please choose 1 correct answer(s).

✓It is always exactly eight characters long.⊗

It is a sequence where the order of characters matters.

It is made up of only numbers.

It can only contain the letters A and T.

⊗Incorrect

Not quite. Focus on how the sequence is represented and why order matters.

Try Again

AI tutor

Tutor settings

Students get a tutor that knows your lessons and sources. Choose Socratic mode for hints and guiding questions or Didactic mode for direct answers, then decide whether it sticks to your materials and pick a persona.